Prüfer & Partner를 소개합니다.

Prüfer & Partner는 지난 50년간 지식재산권 전반에 걸쳐서 유수의 국제적인 기업들을 보호해 왔습니다. 고객의 요구에 초점을 둔 맞춤 상담을 통하여 모든 지역과 지식재산권 분야에서 장기적이며 지속 가능한 성공을 약속드립니다.

사건별 전담팀 제도를 도입하고 있으며 인증된 디지털 프로세스를 구축하여 적시에 당신의 아이디어에 기반한 최적의 솔루션을 제공합니다.

더 알아보기


Prüfer & Partner

향상된 서비스로 최적의 솔루션을 제공하는 고객의 IP 동반자입니다. 20년 이상 함께한 장기 고객이 이를 증명합니다.

더 알아보기

산업재산권 분야별 전문가

고객이 만족하는 최고의 서비스를 제공하기 위해 지속적으로 노력합니다.

전문가 알아보기

미디어 라이브러리

IP의 미래

현재의 아이디어

IP에서의 새로운 업무

Erfindung braucht Erfahrung

최근 소식 및 UPC-뉴스

UP 협약국이 추가되었습니다! (루마니아)

2024년 5월 31일에 UPC 협정에 승인함으로써, 2024년 9월 1일부터 루마니아가 18번째 협약국으로 UPC에 가입하게 되었습니다. 해당 기사는 여기에서 읽을 수 있습니다
기사로 이동

Comment on UPC Court Decision of May 6, 2024

Before the Paris Local Division, in a case where the defendant had forced an intervener into the proceedings pursuant to Rule 316A RoP (forced intervention), the intervener has obtained a period of one month for filing its Application to Intervene as well as for filing its Statement in Intervention. Contrary to Rule 316.2 RoP, which mentions a “further period” for filing the Statement in Intervention, the Court did not set any such further period.
기사로 이동

PRÜFER & PARTNER is ranked again in “The Legal 500” Germany and EMEA 2024

PRÜFER & PARTNER is ranked again in “The Legal 500” Germany and EMEA 2024.
기사로 이동

UPC 판결에서의 청구범위 해석, 사실 제시 및 입증의 책임 부담 – UPC_CoA_335/2023

UPC의 첫 번째 판결을 계기로, 논란이 많았던 청구항 해석, 사실 제시 및 입증의 책임 부담, 진보성판단에 대한 UPC의 입장을 알아보도록 하겠습니다.
기사로 이동

Fee increase of the European Patent Office as of 1 April 2024

The European Patent Office will increase most of its fees by an average of around 5% as of 1 April 2024. The fee increase will be significantly higher for the 3rd and 4th renewal fees, which will rise by almost 30%.
기사로 이동

Comparison of opposition proceedings at the EPO and revocation actions at the UPC – advantages and disadvantages

Since the introduction of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in June 2023, a new system for central attacking the validity of and thereby to nullify a European Patent has been introduced. If a European patent of concern is an EU Unitary Patent, or if a classically validated European patent was not opted out from the competence of the UPC, a central revocation action under the UPC now exists in parallel to an opposition before the European Patent Office (EPO). Therefore, the question arises: what are the pros and cons of challenging the validity either before the EPO or before the UPC? The present report provides some guidance and discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of each system – which eventually is a matter of strategic considerations whether and which advantage may prevail – be it costs, timing, speed of proceedings, and possibly other issues.
기사로 이동

52 years of consistency and still fit for the future – Prüfer und Partner welcomes the next generation of partners

With Dr. Susanne Sonnenhauser and Dr. Christian Gärtner, two very experienced colleagues from the Prüfer und Partner team are joining the management.
기사로 이동

Recent earthquake in Japan

We were deeply shocked to learn of the devastating earthquake in Japan and would like to express our sincere condolences to the victims of this earthquake. In these difficult times, we would like to express our deepest sympathy to you and your fellow human beings.
기사로 이동

Abolition of the 10-day notification fiction at the European Patent Office

In view of the digital age, in which documents will only be served electronically in the future, the European Patent Office will abolish its so-called 10-day fiction of service, which previously governed the calculation of time limits, as of November 1, 2023.
기사로 이동

Dr Dorothea Hofer has obtained the European Patent Litigation Certificate

We are delighted to announce that our managing partner Dr. Dorothea Hofer has obtained the European Patent Litigation Certificate issued by the University of Maastricht in cooperation with the Academy of European Law (ERA) in Trier. This includes an extensive practical and theoretical training in the law underlying the Unified Patent Court (#UPC) and related fields of European law so that she is well prepared for representing clients in all proceedings before the Unified Patent Court.
기사로 이동