fbpx

あなたの知的財産を守る
あなたのための弁理士弁護士

50年にわたり、国際的に有名な企業が、私たちのIP-ブティック フルサービスを利用し、確実に知的財産を保護しています。個別のサービスを提供しお客様のニーズに焦点を当てることで、あらゆる地域と法務分野において、長期的かつ持続的な成功をお約束します。ご依頼ごとに一人の弁理士弁護士が専属し、認証された品質と最先端のデジタルプロセスが、世界中でお客様のアイデアを成功に導きます。

当所サービスの詳細はこちら

表彰&受賞

事務所紹介

私たちは、「お客様の身近な存在」であること、そして「充実したサービス」を提供することで、ソリューション・ファインダーとしての地位を確立しています。お客様の当所へのご依頼が平均して20年以上にわたることが、それを証明しています。

事務所概要

産業財産権保護の専門家チーム

あなたの知的財産を守り成功に導くパートナー

エキスパート紹介

メディアライブラリー

知的財産の未来

今日のアイデア

知的財産法に関する新しい取り組み

発明には経験が必要

メディアライブラリーへ

ニュース および UPC情報

UPファミリーが成長を開始!ルーマニアがUPCに加盟

2024年9月1日にルーマニアはUPCの18番目の加盟国となります。統一特許裁判所に関する協定(UPCA)の批准が2024年5月31日に署名されました
記事へ

Comment on UPC Court Decision of May 6, 2024

Before the Paris Local Division, in a case where the defendant had forced an intervener into the proceedings pursuant to Rule 316A RoP (forced intervention), the intervener has obtained a period of one month for filing its Application to Intervene as well as for filing its Statement in Intervention. Contrary to Rule 316.2 RoP, which mentions a “further period” for filing the Statement in Intervention, the Court did not set any such further period.
記事へ

PRÜFER & PARTNER is ranked again in “The Legal 500” Germany and EMEA 2024

PRÜFER & PARTNER is ranked again in “The Legal 500” Germany and EMEA 2024.
記事へ

UPCから見たクレーム解釈、事実の開示と立証の責任 – UPC_CoA_335/2023

UPCの最初の判決が下された。クレーム解釈、事実の開示と立証の責任、さらに進歩性の検討など、多くの議論がなされている問題に関するUPCの立場を知ることは、エキサイティングなことである。
記事へ

Fee increase of the European Patent Office as of 1 April 2024

The European Patent Office will increase most of its fees by an average of around 5% as of 1 April 2024. The fee increase will be significantly higher for the 3rd and 4th renewal fees, which will rise by almost 30%.
記事へ

Comparison of opposition proceedings at the EPO and revocation actions at the UPC – advantages and disadvantages

Since the introduction of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in June 2023, a new system for central attacking the validity of and thereby to nullify a European Patent has been introduced. If a European patent of concern is an EU Unitary Patent, or if a classically validated European patent was not opted out from the competence of the UPC, a central revocation action under the UPC now exists in parallel to an opposition before the European Patent Office (EPO). Therefore, the question arises: what are the pros and cons of challenging the validity either before the EPO or before the UPC? The present report provides some guidance and discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of each system – which eventually is a matter of strategic considerations whether and which advantage may prevail – be it costs, timing, speed of proceedings, and possibly other issues.
記事へ

52 years of consistency and still fit for the future – Prüfer und Partner welcomes the next generation of partners

With Dr. Susanne Sonnenhauser and Dr. Christian Gärtner, two very experienced colleagues from the Prüfer und Partner team are joining the management.
記事へ

Recent earthquake in Japan

We were deeply shocked to learn of the devastating earthquake in Japan and would like to express our sincere condolences to the victims of this earthquake. In these difficult times, we would like to express our deepest sympathy to you and your fellow human beings.
記事へ

Abolition of the 10-day notification fiction at the European Patent Office

In view of the digital age, in which documents will only be served electronically in the future, the European Patent Office will abolish its so-called 10-day fiction of service, which previously governed the calculation of time limits, as of November 1, 2023.
記事へ

Dr Dorothea Hofer has obtained the European Patent Litigation Certificate

We are delighted to announce that our managing partner Dr. Dorothea Hofer has obtained the European Patent Litigation Certificate issued by the University of Maastricht in cooperation with the Academy of European Law (ERA) in Trier. This includes an extensive practical and theoretical training in the law underlying the Unified Patent Court (#UPC) and related fields of European law so that she is well prepared for representing clients in all proceedings before the Unified Patent Court.
記事へ